Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Max Purcell vs Dane Sweeny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Purcell vs Sweeny analysis and find out who is favored!
Max Purcell vs Dane Sweeny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Purcell 2 - 0 Sweeny
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Purcell has won 52.18% of points on his second serve, while Sweeny has won 51.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Purcell, in recent form, has won 45.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sweeny has won 49.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.73% and 33.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Purcell has saved 63.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sweeny has saved 56.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Purcell has won 41.07% of matches played (W/L 23/ 33), with Sweeny winning 49.18% (W/L 30/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 205/ 142), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19). Sweeny has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 135/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 9/ 18), where as Sweeny has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 22/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Purcell winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Purcell winning 4 and Sweeny winning 0. The last match between Purcell and Sweeny was at the Chennai Challenger, 18-02-2023, Semifinals, Hard with Max Purcell getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Purcell and Sweeny have played a deciding set 0 times, with Purcell winning 0 times and Sweeny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Purcell winning 1, and Sweeny 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Purcell has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.34 while Sweeny has played against players with an average rank of 343.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Purcell has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sweeny has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Purcell has converted 30.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sweeny has converted 42.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Purcell 2 - 0 Sweeny
84
Rank
40
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
224
Rank
194
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
57% (275-205)
Career Total W/L
57% (161-121)
39% (9-14)
YTD W/L
54% (14-12)
$936,175
Career Prize Money
$274,065
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Max Purcell | Dane Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:45 | 1:41:45 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (91/142) | 53% (77/146) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (65/91) | 65% (50/77) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (29/51) | 45% (31/69) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 41% (7/17) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (65/146) | 34% (48/142) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Max Purcell
Player
Dane Sweeny
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Dane Sweeny
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Max Purcell | Dane Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 39% (9/14) | 54% (14/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (23/37) | 52% (34/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (266/316) | 50% (301/306) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 35% (6/11) | 56% (14/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 169 | 67 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:32 | 1:49:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 200.57 | 314.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1041/1821) | 63% (1235/1951) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (744/1041) | 65% (807/1235) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (407/780) | 52% (369/716) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (39/126) | 43% (77/181) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (575/1752) | 39% (757/1923) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 52% (11/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 54% (13/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 70% (7/10) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 38% (13/5) |
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Max Purcell
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Remy Bertola
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Fajing Sun
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Max Purcell
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Max Purcell
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Marcos Giron
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Alex Michelsen
42%
(
44 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
82 of
119)
8
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
54 of
82)
61%
(
37 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Dane Sweeny
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Dane Sweeny
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Dane Sweeny
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Dane Sweeny
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Yanki Erel
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
64%
(
80 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
36%
(
45 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
5
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
8
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Purcell Vs Sweeny Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
